Able Reyna / AK / Amanda Dillon / Anderson Cooper / Anderson Cooper 360 / bad cops / CARELESS WHISPERS / Casie Gotro / Cody Ledbetter / corruption / Cossacks / Crooked attorney / Crooked Judge Robert Stem / crooks in office / Daily Mirror U.K / Damon Reed / David Spence / dick picks / dirty nasty cops / donna doe / drunk women of waco / Jocelyn Elders / John Bradley / John Carroll / Judge Ralph Strother / Judge Ralph Strother Waco / KWTX anchor / Lake Waco Triple Murder / Liar Liar pants on fire / Mary Pirelo Howard / Massage Parlor / massage parlor bust / Masturbation / McLennan County Judge / McLennan County Republican Women / Me Too / Phil Reyna / Ralph Strother / Robert Stem / Roxanne Avery / Rub and Tug / Tommy Witherspoon / Truman Simons / Uncategorized / Vic Feazell / Waco / Waco Judge / Waco News / wacopedia / Walter Smith / Will Hutson / woman of the year / Women helping women

LAKE WACO TRIPLE MURDER: GONE

 APPEALS COURT PUBLISHES OPINION ON CHANEY,  DAVID SPENCE NOT FAR BEHIND,  THANK YOU BITE MARKS,  JUNK SCIENCE,  CROOKS,  AND INNOCENT MEN  

December 26th., 2018

bite mark evidence steven chaney texas exonerated

 

Steven Mark Chaney Opinion                Published December 26th., 2018

 

         The OPINION IS 68 PAGES LONG

HERE IS AN EXCERPT OF THE COURT’S FINDING;

The Court finds that had the bite mark evidence been presented at
trial under current scientific standards, on the preponderance of the
evidence [Chaney] would not have been convicted. In so finding, the
Court notes that bite mark evidence was central to the State’s case —
so much so that — the State even argued to the jury at trial that it
should convict mostly on the bite mark evidence. (RR8: 801-02).
The State further emphasized the bite mark evidence by reminding
the jury that Dr. Hales testified that only one in a million people
could have possibly made the bite mark, asking rhetorically, “What
more do you need?” The impact of this evidence on the jury is
further evidenced by a juror’s testimony in [Chaney]’s Motion for
New Trial hearing that she [voted to convict] based on the bite mark.
(RR9: 6).

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35564041

 

 

https://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/another-texas-exoneration-calls-bite-mark-evidence-into-question/

 

Old pair of dentures

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s